Solutions / Art & heritage
Contexts map to collections and artworks; groups to conservators, insurers and lenders. Every scan, condition report and restoration thread lives in the work's context, visible to exactly the stakeholders who should see it, and the same goes for the agents working for them.
Nothing to model from scratch. The way a heritage organization is already structured (institution, collection, single work) is the hierarchy SweetHive runs on. Visibility, and the AI's knowledge, inherit down it.
Diagnostic imaging, 3D scans and prior interventions are shared into the work's context together with the threads that discuss them. A member's agent scoped to that context answers from those messages in natural language, and can read the PDF reports and images attached to them.
Condition reports and restoration threads build one record per work: what changed, when, by whom. An agent can summarize it from the messages and attachments it was allowed to read.
Insurers and lenders get a context scoped to their involvement. They see only what their groups can see, and any agent working there reads nothing beyond its owner's visibility.
“Every work gets its own context: scan history, condition reports and restoration threads, each in its own scope.”
SweetHive powers the AerariumChain HUB
See scoping live across an institution, a collection and a single loaned work.
Get a demo